The U.S. Administration states that the science is         "clear and compelling," based on the supposed         consensus of 2,000 (and sometimes 2,500) scientists that         "the balance of evidence...suggests a discernible         human influence on global climate." This statement         comes from the 'Summary for Policymakers' of the UN         Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 
The IPCC published three reports of published research         on climate change in 1995 on: science; impacts,         adaptation and mitigation; and economics. The         contributors and reviewers of all three volumes total         about 2,100, relatively few of which are specialists in         atmospheric physics. Most are economists, social         scientists, policy experts, and government functionaries.         
Chapter Eight of the report, "Detection of         Climate Change and Attribution of Causes" which         provided the background for the "discernible impact'         statement, had four lead authors and 32 contributors (not         2,000). After it had been peer-reviewed and approved by         the contributors, the chapter was modified so as to         change the tone, creating considerable controversy.
From this material, the 'Summary for Policymakers' was         written. As one of the IPCC lead authors, Keith Shine         said, "We produce a draft, and then the policymakers         go through it line by line and change the way it is         presented... It's peculiar that they have the final say         in what goes into a scientists' report."
Robert Reinstein, former chief State Department         negotiator on the climate treaty under President Bush,         agrees that the wording of the summary was negotiated at         length by international delegations. "Because of         this," he said, "the summary must be considered         purely a political document, not a scientific one."
Ben Santer, one of the lead authors of the         controversial Chapter Eight, said, "It's unfortunate         that many people read the media hype before they read the         chapter. I think the caveats are there. We say quite         clearly that few scientists would say the attribution         issue was a done deal."
In July 1996, over 100 European and American         scientists issued the "Leipzig Declaration,"         warning that there is still no scientific consensus on         the subject of climate change. "On the         contrary," the statement says, "most scientists         now accept the fact that actual observations from earth         satellites show no climate warming whatsoever."
 
No comments:
Post a Comment